Originally posted by Spacemunkie
Now let\'s go through those numbers again, because they\'re a little baffling at first glance.
England, where no one has guns, fffffffourteen deaths. United States, and I think you know how we feel about guns - woooo, I\'m getting a stiffy - twenty-three thousand deaths from handguns.
But there\'s no connection, and you\'d be a fool and a Communist to make one. There\'s no connection between having a gun and shooting someone with it, and not having a gun and not shooting someone. There have been studies made and there is no connection at all there. Yes. That\'s absolute proof.
You know, fourteen deaths from handguns.
Probably American tourists, too.\"
Says it all for me really....
That\'s a bit silly really, I mean you really can\'t have gun deaths without guns, just like you can\'t have car crashes without cars.
It\'s like saying in the Crusades there were no gun deaths, therefore it was safer, while taking sharp, pointy, swords out of the equation.
It\'s a silly comparison.
Try violent crimes vs violent crimes and see whether guns make a difference.
Also add in population difference, and a point I think is often ignored, population density.
Didn\'t you guys just have someone killed in the street with an axe, in broad daylight?
In other words, you\'re looking at guns being the issue, when they are not. Violent Deaths are the true issue, and they can be and will happen in more ways than with guns.
If I truly want to kill someone, not having a gun will not stop me.
Guns are not the true problem. People are. since the first man found a sharp rock we have been killing each other in new and inventive ways. Taking guns away won\'t solve that.
Also, between being bludgeoned to death, stabbed to death (which always seems to be multiple stab wounds), hit by a car, or shot, I\'d rather be shot.