Hi all
Let me tell you there is a load I could say on this subject (as well as many other subjects in this project) now that it has ended. My silence here has been an ocean of energy that started within a week of the projects conception.
Now lets go back in time...
http://www.coolminiornot.com/forums/viewthread.php?tid=6980&page=3
And I will place a quote here:
French kid posted this on the page you are linked to \"On the topic of the NGOs that are helping out in asia I have a few links handy somwhere since I\'m organising somthing in my highschool, I\'ll post them as soon as I have time. If you want to send exclusively to the victims of the asia disaster I\'d sugest avoiding the red cross has their donation contract dosn\'t require them to give the money to the cause you have decided to suport should they feel that it would be better spent elswere. MSF isn\'t accepting anymore donation because they feel they have anouth already and unlike the red cross can\'t spend it on somthing els. So that leavs about 3-4 NGOs.\"
People at the time were worried about other things but keep reading..there\'s more.
I checked FK was indeed right
I checked and checked and I found one you could indeed earmark for the one disaster here is the post:
http://www.coolminiornot.com/forums/viewthread.php?tid=6980&page=4
Then pages later I find
\"that the best way to deal with this is act like it is a commission for a client(client being Red Cross),\" it is on this page
\"
http://www.coolminiornot.com/forums/post.php?action=reply&fid=4&tid=9976
After that no mention of the matter in any post.
No, on 1/11 /2005 a press release was made and the charity was started as Brothers Brother (which was chosen because it would earmark funds for this specific disaster and got such good reviews by Forbes).....no one complained or apparently really read the thing ..i guess
though people translated it in what 4 languages... and if you read the translations you will see at that time it was brothers keeper
1/18/05 I received a letter from one of the organizers that has since left us stating they would pull out unless it was the Red Cross. It was at the time a very important person you all felt so I was quiet. I responded to many things that had happened to me a few hours later but this refers to the charity.
This quotes my letter 1/18/05 in response:
\"I put the information out there on the forum in the first thread. It was mentioned in the thread that the Red Cross would not ear mark funds for the disaster by another member of this project. Thus I looked for other options. The Forbes report was impressive to me so I posted the information. No one objected nor have they until now. It was posted on EO no neg response. People are concerned with whether their money is used wisely and this organization purchases medical equipment and pharmaceuticals not things to inspire Christianity.\"
In that letter I resigned from all help but the website and I remained that way until the project moved to DR\'s.
As far as the tax receipt the buyer gets that so they may file for the tax credit of their donation.
And as far as GW I feel sure they as well understand the Red Cross and the handling of the money heck the lawyers had to approve linking to the Paint Aid web site let alone where the money was going.